Some people want governments to spend money looking for life on other planets. Others, however, think this is a waste of public money when there are so many problems on earth.
Discuss both these views and given your own opinion.
Some people think that governments of nations all over the world should invest finance in the exploration of extraterrestrial life on other planets, whereas others claim that this action devours a great deal of public budget since a lot of pressing global issues are still available. In my opinion, I agree with the second view.
On the one hand, it is said that the search for outer-space living forms ought to be conducted by governments with investment money. The most foremost reason is that it could help solve exploding population on Earth. It is a fact that an overwhelming number of inhabitants is an alarming concern, which causes subsequent hard-to-be-tackled situations, such as natural resource depletion and freshwater scarcity. Thus, for over decades, aircraft have been launched into the void, seeking life on cosmic bodies. If this project is a success, it can benefit all humankind. They can later reside in Earth-like extrasolar planets without the fear of the population explosion and other worrying matters.
On the other hand, others and I believe that there are numerous thorny issues which need monetary resources. One issue is starvation. It is estimated by the World Food Program that more than 20% of the population on the globe are facing hunger, which strongly affects their learning, work and production. Also, 30% of the children in developing countries, within the continent of Africa in particular, are suffering acute malnutrition, which severely impacts genetic inheritance of the future citizens. Thus, there should be financial aid from governmental agencies besides benefactors. Another issue is racism. This term means an unequal treatment of people who belong to different races, which can be easily observed in any community, regardless of civilization, age and societal scale. The racial discrimination could have a devastating repercussions on those who are targeted, in terms of working lives and social connectedness. Hence, the money for launching campaigns eradicating conflicts and prejudice should be allocated by governments.
In conclusion, there are merits to both arguments based on the above discussion and analysis, but I believe the second view is more reasonable.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, if, second, so, still, thus, whereas, in conclusion, in particular, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1880.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41786743516 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06343988632 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 176.041082164 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634005763689 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.0557453266 49.4020404114 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.444444444 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2777777778 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19916000652 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0482882163204 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511901688475 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119878554278 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554690037656 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.08 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.