Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later, and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It can not be denied that people after being in prison are likely to be good citizens then. Many people contend that ex-prisoners are the best people to explain the adolescents the negatives impacts of becoming offenders. I completely disagree with this point of view for some reasons.
Firstly, it is obvious that the ex-prisoners have considerate contributions to discipline the next generation. That is, after a long period of being educated in the prison, they have gained a deeper understanding of their fault and make a sense of how to correct their wrongdoing. Therefore, it is easier for them to make a speech to teenagers that adolescent had better behave in moral ways and avoid being committed offence.
On the other hand, there are various reasons why ex-prisoners are not truly suitable for talking to teenagers about the dangerous aspects of being an offender. Perhaps the principal reason for this view is that adolescent should be disciplined in the early years by their parents and teachers. That is the importance of education about laws and proper manners in the mature process of a boy or a girl. As a result, teenagers probably make a sense of what they should do to prevent them from committing a crime. For example, in primary school, students are given discipline about the codes of morality and legal system and encouraged to become good citizens.
In conclusion, for the reason I mentioned above, I strongly believe that people have been in prison are always the best ones who can play a vital role in crime education. Besides, combining between parental and schooling methods of education leads to more positive outcomes.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, so, then, therefore, for example, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1382.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00724637681 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76732859278 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579710144928 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.8284046383 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.307692308 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2307692308 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264105171264 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0849734850713 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640627496439 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154228655923 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532611986392 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.