Varied beliefs are thought on whether people need to either get stuck or change their firm. While, it is safe to remain in the old job, In my opinion, I believe that new knowledge or skills can be achieved from different workforce.
On the one hand, people feel accustomed with their institution they have chosen to work. This is so because, the employees are used to the traditions, norms and values of the business, which genuinely makes them acquire a feeling of fulfillment. In other words, they are relatively grounded in almost all disciplines of the organization which makes them feel at ease in discharging their respective duties. Additionally, the workers would have gained firm trust from their employers based on the numerous years spent considerably. For example, in situations where the employee shows up late at work, once there is existing trust, they are likely to be pardoned, thereby sustained in the business.
On the other hand, I would argue that a lot more benefits could be achieved through having to work for other institutions. Relevant ideas, however, can be learned and adopted when moving to organizations elsewhere. Take for instance, an organization where the vast majority of employees exhibit expertise in the use of machinery, new recruits could learn more advanced methods and skills. Another point worth considering is that, employees come into contact with other people from different cultural backgrounds, which promotes interpersonal relationship. Therefore gaining significant communication skills within one another, which becomes an ultimate advantage.
In conclusion, even though, it is risk-free remaining at one's default organization, I think additional knowledge is empirical to be achieved in other businesses.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 557, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ch promotes interpersonal relationship. Therefore gaining significant communication skill...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 58, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...en though, it is risk-free remaining at ones default organization, I think additiona...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44890510949 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00001997969 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64598540146 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.669453608 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.846153846 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0769230769 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3076923077 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198371922822 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0650235167111 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521780339024 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101964336429 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462703336027 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.