In recent decades, postponing going to university after finishing high school programs for vacations or occupations has become a growing trend, especially among young graduates. Given that the trend might create some positive opportunities and time to sort themselves out, this is not without limitations.
On the one hand, there are some benefits that high school leavers would gain when spending a gap year traveling or experiencing jobs. Firstly, one of the positive sides of taking a year off before entering the university is that the opportunity to accumulate practical work experience is opened for them when getting part-time jobs, which absolutely enables them to explore their fields of interest to make a wise educational decision. Moreover, these short-term jobs can provide the graduates a sum of money to cover their necessities for university education, such as advanced technical equipment or transportations, which probably is most suitable for individuals who do not receive any financial support while the cost of studying is extremely expensive. Secondly, in terms of recreation, gap-year takers can have chances to and release stress in the study, which they perhaps deserve after their twelve-year period of hard studying, especially in Vietnam. Students in this country are always under great academic pressure, from both family and school, so taking a break for a year should be considered so as to relax and be well-prepared for the next education path. This decision sometimes should be made by highschool leavers, even widespread, not only the practical experience but also relaxation may provide careful preparation for university studying.
The flip side of the coin is that the above-mentioned advantages are probably outweighed by negative outcomes affecting gap-year takers. First, students normally tend to gradually lose their certain academic knowledge at highschool, which is the foundation for the higher education environment in universities, leading to not catching up with learning programs after a year break. This may make students no longer interested in studying and drop out of university midway in order to go back to the job they did in a gap year, whose salary is always significantly lower than the ones if they complete their study that they can not predict or have but can not make a different decision. Additionally, the decision to take a year break from high school leavers can expose them to unforeseen dangerous accidents while traveling or deplete their possessions by squandering too much of this time. For instance, paying a visit to isolated areas where inclement and treacherous terrain always exists will probably put themselves in danger, even seriously injured that they certainly regret in their entire life. Also, Expensive travel costs will also put a lot of pressure on both their families and themselves, even if they will not be able to afford to continue their studies.
In conclusion, although taking a gap year benefits the takers in a variety of ways, its drawbacks should also be elaborately considered, but if used correctly, the decision perhaps is tremendously profitable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1109, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...a break for a year should be considered so as to relax and be well-prepared for the next...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1365, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ul preparation for university studying. The flip side of the coin is that the ab...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2667.0 1615.20841683 165% => OK
No of words: 499.0 315.596192385 158% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34468937876 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72634191566 4.20363070211 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94436452442 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 281.0 176.041082164 160% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563126252505 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 835.2 506.74238477 165% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 33.0 20.2975951904 163% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.4136535 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 177.8 106.682146367 167% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.2666666667 20.7667163134 160% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26666666667 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195186833511 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681581869023 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424859357186 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110682984307 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0700061818733 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.4 13.0946893788 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.52 50.2224549098 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 11.3001002004 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 141.0 78.4519038076 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.1190380762 150% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.