Some schools have restricted the use of mobile phones
Use of cellular phones have recently been limited by certain educational establishments. Some people argue that it restricts children's freedom, but others believe that, while at school, pupil's ought to concentrate on learning. I agree with the latter one and see ban on mobile phones as a positive development as they tend to be a great distraction for all, young minds in particular.
On the one side, some people belive thatschool age students, should have a right to use their own belongings, if they were trusted with cellular device by their parents, than school has no right to restrict their use. At the end of the day, they might need to be able to get in touch with parents or siblings. I strongly disagree with these merits as the educational establishment is a place of learning, requiring quietness and concentration. Phones provide nothing but that. Furthermore, if a pupil needs to urgently get in touch with parents, it can be done with the aid of a teacher.
In my opinions mobile phones are a formidable distraction to a learning process for students and lecturers alike. Not only they are noisy devices, easily disturbing classes with loud and frequent notification but they create in pupil's an urge of constant checking them, "just in case". For example, a recent research by University of Keele shows, that middle school's pupils, if allowed to have their phone during the class with the sound switched off, would check it, on average, once every 8 minutes.
In conclusion, I do not perceive limiting use of the mobiles in school environment as something negative, quite the opposite. In my opinion, it is a very positive development, which will help school age children to concentrate on the subject of the lesson, making learning process more efficient.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 97, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n to a learning process for students and lecturers alike. Not only they are noisy...
^^
Line 5, column 311, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'recent research'.
Suggestion: recent research
... 'just in case'. For example, a recent research by University of Keele shows, that midd...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, while, for example, in conclusion, in particular, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1496.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02013422819 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8893923066 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61744966443 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2759250442 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.076923077 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84615384615 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325747536905 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10210687469 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844527851418 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196357852767 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0769811853304 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.