Some scientists think it is very soon that computers will be more intelligent than human. Some people think it is a positive development, while others think it is a negative development. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Since the invention of computers, human's lives have undergone drastic transformation either physically or mentally. It is a common notion that the artificial intelligence will soon surpass human and this is advantageous. Others, however, strongly oppose this view because of some reasons.
To begin with, computers are developing with an increasing pace and its intelligence is beneficial in some extent. First, they are designed to process and analyze different types of information in a very sophisticated manner within a nick of time. In fact, challenging math equations can be solved by a scientific computer in just a glance. Moreover, it is soon that computer function will proceed beyond the human mind as they are able to store massive amount of information, regardless of languages. This could barely be done by just one or a couple of individuals. Recording the list of students enrolling for a specific course at university, for instance, is easily finished with the help of a 14-inch laptop with a modern microchip incorporated inside.
Looking at the negative side of computers, the replacement of them at work might impose several threats to the labor force. Many employees with poor performance will lose their job as a result of expenditure saving. This consequently affects negatively to the employment rate, especially in IT industry. When computers do all of the tasks at workplace, people are more likely to be dependent on them and become lazy. Meanwhile, the presence of too much technological devices in daily life, not just computers, limits everyone's communication skills. A number of teenagers, in particular, prefer to text to their friends using messaging apps rather than have direct conversations in person. Taking young children in to account, using too much computers highly likely leads to addiction, in some cases, the degradation in literacy level due to the extra reliance on spell checker tools.
To conclude, despite the significant benefits computers bring us by being superb intelligent, I strongly believe that their drawbacks are unpredictable and thus humans shall be the smart ones who control computers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 323, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ially in IT industry. When computers do all of the tasks at workplace, people are more lik...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 737, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...young children in to account, using too much computers highly likely leads to addict...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, look, moreover, so, thus, while, for instance, in fact, in particular, as a result, in some cases, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1820.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35294117647 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06448006394 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8478046536 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.058823529 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.58823529412 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170760058849 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.048851070272 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.035595212803 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0974773549409 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0207830564265 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.