Some teachers think that international student exchange would be beneficial for all teenage school students. Do you think its advantages will outweigh the disadvantages?
It is recommended by teachers students participate in exchange programs as they yield promising benefits. While some people show their discordance with the notion, from my perspective, this approach’s disadvantages pale in comparison with its advantages.
There are justified reasons for aversion to foreign student exchange methods. Students will be overwhelmed with different cultures and lifestyles; the need to adapt to it forthrightly can invoke homesickness and instigate depression, which may result in ruptures in their life and wreak havoc on their mental health. Moreover, international pupils are likely to be stigmatized. For example, Asian students can be otherized when coming to western countries where white supremacy prevails; in addition, European and American repugnance towards their Eastern counterparts also rockets at the height of the virulent epidemic Covid-19 which is suspected to boil down to the Chinese’s market. This egregious risk indicates that oriental pupils might suffer from racial segregation or get involved in unprovoked scrimmages or even assault.
However, these menaces seem minor upon reflection of the merits. Exchangers will have more chances to hone their language and communication skills interacting with the native. Moreover, they are independent of their parents, which enables them to fend for themselves- a focal soft skill for any youngster. Another perk is that should they break the ice, they can make friends from many countries with distinct cultures, becoming responsive to changes. On the other hand, getting accustomed to diverse nationals also drastically changes their standpoints, especially prejudices. American transfers might jettison the deep-seated hatred to swarthy-skinned people. Furthermore, multitudes of introverted, reserved students after the exchange have reportedly become live wires, leading to a more barnstorming lifestyle. An abundance of them has asserted that the transition helps them fortify their self-esteem, gaining more confidence, and acknowledge their self-worth. All of those cachets serve to make them better.
In conclusion, regardless of several demerits, I believe students can achieve more abroad as long as they have enough gumption and perseverance to grapple with these challenges.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1965.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.9186746988 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09314178928 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.674698795181 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.2001088725 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.588235294 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5294117647 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.82352941176 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162599366116 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0526308559517 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494787360087 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100613181464 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.045156711439 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.06 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.76 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 78.4519038076 166% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.