Space travel has been possible for some time and some people believe that space tourism could be developed in the future.
Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
Spacefaring has made some giant leaps recently and it is thought that the tourism of space could grow bigger in the long run. From my perspective, it is absolutely a positive development.
Proponents of the contrary standpoint claim that it is a waste of money and time for space travel, which could be a potent argument. For starters, there are still a large number of impoverished countries, particularly the ones located in Africa and Asia, which need financial support. Thus, developed nations should offer help to such less abundant neighboring states by investing money in industry and services. As a result, consolidation and friendliness on the globe are likely to be strengthened, making good conditions for long-lasting peace afterwards. Another reason for not developing space discovery is time devotion. To be more specific, no one can guarantee the exact interval of time before a planet with favorable elements akin to Earth is found. The whole process for a planet-searching project could last a decade or perhaps a few centuries, and if it leads to nowhere in the end, it would definitely be heavy time consumption. Instead, that huge amount of time could be put into agricultural research or energy-saving modes of transportation, which could benefit society on a large scale.
That said, I believe space exploration would be of a favorable tendency. One prime cause is that economic development would be further spurred. The United States, for example, is one of the leading countries in space tourism, and its economy enjoy plenty of profit from this type of industry. Also, specialized aircraft and other flying objects would be built, appealing for foreign cash flows. Besides, a high level of employment would be created accordingly, accelerating regional economic growth as well. Another cause is enrichment of experiences. In other words, space travelers could be on the once-in-a-lifetime pleasure voyage into the grand void, observing celestial bodies and admiring permanent beauty of stars. Outstanding and memorable moments would be ingrained in the passengers’ mind, producing a yearning sense of returning. In contrast, a journey on a cruise ship in the sea appears to be tedious and uneventful to wealthy passengers. They cannot experience adventurous feelings and witness remarkable scenes but use services and play games when boarding the ship. The trip is therefore likely to be forgotten after a short time when they arrive on land. In retrospect, the travelers do not state how glamorous the sea voyage is, but what amenities and comforts it brings.
In summary, tourism in space is certainly a positive development because of the aforementioned reasons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 163, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...argument. For starters, there are still a large number of impoverished countries, particularly th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, but, if, so, still, then, therefore, thus, well, for example, in contrast, in summary, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 13.1623246493 198% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2269.0 1615.20841683 140% => OK
No of words: 429.0 315.596192385 136% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28904428904 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10973883157 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 176.041082164 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608391608392 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 712.8 506.74238477 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6730055789 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.652173913 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.652173913 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.17391304348 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 8.67935871743 196% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344870395236 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0881028597911 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726767799409 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211291556189 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0255717516439 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 78.4519038076 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.