In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry
Why is this the case?
What can be done about this problem?
Regardless of the developments made in agriculture, people across the world still starve without food. In my opinion, the cause of this global issue is because most nations fail to invest adequately in their agricultural sector. Nevertheless, a solution to this problem is for the national leaders to make agriculture a priority, by sufficient investment and placing a high tariff on imported produce.
There are many reasons why people across the globe still go without food, despite the progress made in agriculture. One of major cause is that many heads of state make wrong decisions by not investing sufficiently in agriculture. Furthermore, governments especially in the third world countries fail to support local farmers with grants, interest-free loans and lands. Thus, people rely heavily on imported produce and subsequently, hunger exist because this agricultural imports are expensive and most poor citizens cannot afford.
However, one of the possible remedies to the issues hunger still existing globally despite the improvements in agriculture is for the government to make sufficient funds portioned to agriculture and introduce higher taxes on agricultural imports. Undeniably, this will create plenty focus on local farmers and encourage them to grow more crops in the land and shun the habit of agricultural importation. Subsesequently, this will lead to cheaper foods available for all, thereby reducing hunger levels in the society.
To sum up, a reason why people around the globe still suffer starvation with little or no food, despite growths in agriculture is because the governments in many countries do not invest sufficiently in this area. Nonetheless, a possible way forward to this crisis is for the governments to empower local farmers and put a higher tax on agricultural imports.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 433, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly on imported produce and subsequently, hunger exist because this agricultural i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, still, third, thus, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1540.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4609929078 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06930820946 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549645390071 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6542481494 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.333333333 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.41666666667 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269299697931 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102611826437 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546197086631 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17810011044 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0308062398842 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.