In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
Why is this the case?
What can be done about this problem?
It is true that apart from the prevalence of agricultural technology, millions of people around the world still suffer from hunger and malnutrition. There are a number of reasons behind this phenomenon and several solutions should be adopted by governments and individuals to improve the situation.
There are two primary reasons why many people all over the world still could not afford to buy food. The first reason is that the rating increasingly population is so fast. Consuming an amount of food and commodity at the same time, so people are likely to be to could not afford to manufacture and meet the requirements of all of the people in the world. The second reason is that many developing countries and densely populated zone such as India or Africa have not enough money to import food. This could produce a detrimental impact on health human-like: malnutrition, a decrease in people’s immune system or cardiovascular system.
Fortunately, there are various measures that could be taken to tackle this problem. One solution is that the government should give top priority to decreasing the population and raise public awareness of the declining population. For example, each family is likely to be to have a maximum of 2 children. Another measure is that governments in advanced countries should take steps to cut down on taxes and decrease products price in developing countries. Moreover, wealthy people should give assistance in doing charity to support people in remote areas.
In conclusion, it is clear that despite the fast growth of agricultural technology, a number of people still suffer from malnutrition, and many steps need to be taken to tackle this problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 325, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...anufacture and meet the requirements of all of the people in the world. The second reason...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 638, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...immune system or cardiovascular system. Fortunately, there are various measures ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, moreover, second, so, still, apart from, for example, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1415.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14545454545 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91471274969 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541818181818 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7655489354 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.846153846 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1538461538 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.30769230769 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255764510061 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0871229393454 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0685541683045 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167431213582 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432416740212 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.