In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this the case?
Nowadays agriculture has been known as a noticeable way of providing food for people all around the world. Despite the fact that humans achieved a breakthrough in agriculture during past dacades, still there are people suffering from inadequate diet and hunger. Although there are specific root causes associated with this issue, effective policies can be adopted to remedy this problem which will be elaborated in detail in this essay.
There are several main reasons why despite the advancements in agriculture, there are many people who have not sufficient diet. Firstly, many farmers around the world are grappling with extreme weather conditions such as drought, hurricane, and flood which destroy all their crops. Consequently, this would reduce the available food, and increases hunger and poverty. Secondly, in most developing countries, farmers still use outdated methods which could have lower efficiency compared to updated methods. In other words, this will lead to less yields for consumption as well as previous reason. Finally, there is an extra reason which makes the situation even worse. Expensive basic ingredients and economic crisis have made these crops unaffordable, so due to the low wage, many people cannot afford what they need.
There are , however, some workable solution which can be done to help individuals overcome this problem. First off, developed countries and agencies around the world should help developed countries with their knowledge and methods. To be precise, the more knowledge they have, the easier they can deal with harsh weather condition and outdated method. As a result of this, these conditions cannot bring serious detrimental to their yields ,and hunger will have a decline. Finally, the government is in charge to tackle with economic problems involved in this problem. For example they can consider some incentives to encourage people for cultivation or provides farmers cheap lands. As a consequence, the price of food will drop , and it will no longer be a problem for people.
In conclusion, individuals are around the world having problem with providing their food, and suffering from hunger for some compelling reasons such as old methods and weather conditions. Some contributing factors such as sharing information and incentives from government can be beneficial.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 541, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun yields is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...hods. In other words, this will lead to less yields for consumption as well as previ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 10, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nnot afford what they need. There are , however, some workable solution which c...
^^
Line 5, column 439, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ring serious detrimental to their yields ,and hunger will have a decline. Finally,...
^^
Line 5, column 729, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...consequence, the price of food will drop , and it will no longer be a problem for ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1977.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46132596685 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7125987439 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563535911602 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 598.5 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.3457454337 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.052631579 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0526315789 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.84210526316 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198983266312 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060159758582 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051783505837 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129185748202 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0727279979061 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.