In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
Why is this case?
What can be done about this problem?
Over the centuries, the growth of agriculture contributed to the rise of civilizations. It is often a concerned issue by a large number of individuals that despite advancements in farming, the starvation rates are significantly high among the nations across the world. This essay will analyze the causes of this subject and also provide the possible measures to overcome this global concern.
To commence with, even though the technological enhancements that shaped this agriculture sector into an advanced level, empty stomach's are almost everywhere in the world. This is due to three central causes, the excessive utilization of synthetic fertilizers and pesticides over longer durations. Secondly, human’s malicious activities such as deforestation caused climatic changes, in turn it had a great impact on monsoons. Lastly, insufficient land for grain storage leads to damage and loss of precious resources, and food disposal among the cities. To illustrate, one of the recent researcher’s states that, farmers globally apply a million tones of nitrogen to crops every year, of which around 30% is used by the plants where the remaining is washed off into rivers and lakes and pollutes the environment.
On the other hand, in order to alleviate the consequences of these factors, government bodies should adopt new methods such as educating the public on detrimental effects of weather changes by employing campaigns. Additionally, it should provide subsidies and land for farmers, and also it should encourage them to use organic manure to reduce the emission of toxic gases in air and water bodies. Moreover, it should pass legislation to reduce the food wastage in the cities, and encourage people to recycle the resources. For instance, in recent years, France has emerged as an inspiration to many nations for its strict zero food waste policies. As an outcome, the food in restaurants and supermarkets were donated to charities which ultimately reduced the main concern.
To recapitulate, innovation always comes with certain drawbacks such as intensive use of chemical nutrients to get high yields and human unconscious gestures in damaging the ecosystem that leads to starvation all over the world. In order to transcend these concerns, authorities should take appropriate actions to protect the present and future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 122, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...tions. It is often a concerned issue by a large number of individuals that despite advancements i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...res to overcome this global concern. To commence with, even though the techno...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ultimately reduced the main concern. To recapitulate, innovation always comes...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, lastly, moreover, second, secondly, so, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1989.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46428571429 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97943455205 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618131868132 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 620.1 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3884186508 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.6 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2666666667 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122085484484 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0371720281695 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490311924545 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.074029517285 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0595945458791 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.42 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 78.4519038076 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.