In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this the case? What can be done about this problem?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge. Write at least 250 words.
While some people have a stable amount of food, other sometimes eat extremely little or nothing no matter how agricultural aspect has developed increasingly in their countries. In my opinion, I will give both some reasons and solutions about this situation.
There have more effects as well as methods dealing a food problem. Firstly, the most remarkable factors are weather and disaster. Suppose that a country faces with lots of catastrophic natural phenomenons namely volcano, hurricane, tornado or flood, the number of lands, farms and other agricultural internalized will be destroyed totally leading to a shortage of food in some days. To deal with, the more food aids a country receives, the less increase in famines. It is such an extremely necessary that more and more either organizations or citizens are willing to help poor countries to overcome their difficulties.
Furthermore, apart from natural disasters, does an enrich agriculture relate to the quality of land, water and how people take care of them. For example, in some Africa countries being belonged to Sahara area, were sand to be rich land, crops would grow more effectively. People have felt intricate to use the weight of both themselves and animals like camels to transfer a large kind of food from other places permanently. Consequently, it is time that the government should own the number of technological devices to improve a shortage of food.
In conclusion, the number of citizens not having enough meals will drop as long as food aids and technology will be taken in consideration.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 49, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ore, apart from natural disasters, does an enrich agriculture relate to the quality of la...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, well, while, apart from, for example, in conclusion, kind of, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1321.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18039215686 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90737174395 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.635294117647 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3879579495 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.083333333 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0793573990372 0.244688304435 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0316317780116 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0365188975926 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0508424009941 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331821079537 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.