Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Verbal communication is believed to have more influences than written counterpart. From my perspective, I believe it depends on circumstances each individual face and which ones they prefer.
On the one hand, when it comes to the situation that requires oral skills and facial expressions, verbal communication is more effective than written one. In order to break the ice or make the confabulation becomes more vigorous and exciting, people need to talk directly to the others instead of texting to them. For example, taking a date, seeing each other and having an oral conversation would make the relationship between them inseparable. Pictures, texts could never take precedence over a smile, a warm hug and a nice, cozy conversation. Additionally, verbal communication helps people know the real attitude and expression of others. By having a conversation, through their gestures and expressions, people could know what the others thought and therefore could have solutions to handle. If they are texting, they would not know what their opponents thinking and this might lead to misconception.
On the other hand, written communication is more powerful than verbal counterpart regarding law and business. People have the tendency to trust what was written than what was told. For instance, in court, spoken would not be approved without any valid evidence such as written documents, to support their argument. In addition, written communication such as documents, files would save a great amount of time for big companies when they demonstrate the effectiveness and the utilization of their products. By doing this, their companies would earn respect from other companies and trust from customers.
In conclusion, liking and disliking vary between people. Both types of communication could bring people a wide variety of benefits, and it depends on situations that people face.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, therefore, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1591.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41156462585 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03607393209 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574829931973 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2271251166 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4375 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.375 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247990925414 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0858864650854 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0928964678722 0.0667982634062 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148484893013 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688858431693 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.