The last several decades have witnessed the expansion of multinational companies, which has resulted in the growth of globalization. To some extent, it is beneficial to many people, bridging citizens in different areas and exposing them to a larger world. However, in my view, this phenomenon can jeopardize some vital interests.
Presumably, multinational companies and globalization can significantly enrich people's life. They make it possible for individuals to get access to goods from all over the world. For instance, in Walmart, We can buy kiwi fruit that comes from New Zealand, Cosmetics made in Japan, and flowers grown in Holland at one shopping. Never could we have imagined it before globalization.
However, multinational companies and globalization have the potential to devastate diversity and the local market. Many giant enterprises employ a low-price strategy to compete with local companies, which is temporary but efficient. After the counterparts fall down, the greedy monopoly will quickly add the goods price as people have no alternatives. Gradually, that city will lose its distinctiveness, becoming as ordinary as any other cities are.
Furthermore, global companies can aggravate inequality. Taking the Apply company, for example, locates the design departments in developed countries for ideas while setting up factories in developing countries for low labor costs. As a result, the citizens in the former countries receive higher pay, while the latter countries' residents suffer from heavy pollution.
To sum up, the sprawl of multinational companies and the development of globalization can partly add flavor to citizens' lives. Still, they can be harmful to diversity and human rights as well. It is better to be on the lookout for them and never overlook the protection of the local businesses.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 64, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...panies can aggravate inequality. Taking the Apply company, for example, locates the desig...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, look, so, still, well, while, for example, for instance, as a result, in my view, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1558.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54448398577 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13867302338 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622775800712 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.2937426315 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.6470588235 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5294117647 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.17647058824 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105638337375 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0396431174148 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591272518035 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0573869521577 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00864703206233 0.056905535591 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.