Technology has ushered in an entirely new era for all humans where direct or indirect interaction is not considered a big problem. With the aid of technology, making relationships with people is much easier while most of these rapports are virtual. From a personal point of view, this is a negative movement since rapid and unreal relationships mean unstable and unsafe affairs.
First and foremost, finding new friends is not a difficult task thanks to technology and the internet. In the past, a friendship or a romantic affair often started from meetings on streets, at school, or workplace. In our modern world, people only need a smart device such as a smartphone or a laptop with a good internet connection to build up a new rapport with different people from different regions. Unfortunately, most of the relationships which are made online are virtual and untrustworthy. According to a survey carried out in the USA about the impact of technology on humans’ relationships, more and more people are building these virtual relationships and myriads of them were in trouble or under threat.
For the reason above, I affirm that this is a negative development. Virtual and vulnerable relationships via technology and online platforms pose various kinds of threats to people involved. Take Vietnam for example, since 2020, many teenagers have experienced internet fraud because of making friends with virtual strangers. In addition, building and relying on online rapports also instigate interactions among people in real life. Accordingly, the more people are dependent on online rapports, the fewer dialogues in person might be made. Gradually, society as a whole can easily become distant and impersonal.
In conclusion, technology facilitates our friend-making progress but these relationships also latent lots of danger. Therefore, it seems to me that virtual interactions among humans bring more drawbacks than benefits, in other words, a negative development.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 615, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n easily become distant and impersonal. In conclusion, technology facilitates ou...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, if, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1668.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39805825243 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09305550967 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595469255663 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8993034318 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.25 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3125 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5625 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263557578639 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0801868326591 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0405128150618 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161271726664 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411988624825 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.