Teamwork offers a lot of benefits in the modern society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is sometimes argued that working in the group brings us positive sides. While I strongly agree with this statement, I do not believe that teamwork can be seen as a positive activity.
First of all, to tackle any problems, group discussion is a good activity in some cases. One benefit is, there are various ways to address the works because the ideas are contributed by different members of a team. As a result, the works complete fluently and acquire success. For example, to establish a company, it is necessary to have more than one person to be responsible for its fields. The second benefit is, teamwork can help people to recognize their cons and learn experience from the others. For instance, when improving speaking skill in a group, not only becoming more confident, some people can also change their local accents, absorbing new vocabularies,... Therefore, discussing in the group will remove the mistakes of a person.
On the other hand, the aforementioned benefits can be seen as the opposite angle. Firstly, if there are having numerous different ideas, this will lead to the difference of opinions and the plans will not go to the end since everyone has their own point of views and these statements are not accepted. Secondly, some people have a tendency to sit back and let others do the work in a team situation. As well as being inefficient, this can also breed resentment and lower morale for the whole team.
In conclusion, debating with a team will have both beneficial and detrimental effects in any workplace.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 476, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to experience'
Suggestion: to experience
...eople to recognize their cons and learn experience from the others. For instance, when imp...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 669, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...ocal accents, absorbing new vocabularies,... Therefore, discussing in the group wi...
^^
Line 5, column 112, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'numerous'.
Suggestion: numerous
...ite angle. Firstly, if there are having numerous different ideas, this will lead to the difference...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, first of all, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1284.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90076335878 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75631720608 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606870229008 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0334044192 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7142857143 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7142857143 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.5714285714 7.06120827912 192% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0694602516393 0.244688304435 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0251787713588 0.084324248473 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0396184892152 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0440615195505 0.151304729494 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035352532091 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.