Television has destroyed communication among friends and family. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is sometimes argued that people are being lacked the ability of interaction. While I agree with the statement about reducing the time of watching TV, it cannot deny that television can offer much more benefits.
On the one hand, being addicted to television is the result of unconfidence in conversation. Firstly, the media cannot give people the chance to talk in practice since people only pay attention to watch TV and do not speak or doing other things. Therefore, the relationship in people has been destroyed. Secondly, spending much time on television instead of outdoor activities will not only lead to the break of exchange but also affect their life skills. Therefore, in some case, the drawbacks of media are much higher than the benefits.
In my opinion, it also offers huge benefits for everyone. The first advantage is that it is the way to connect people with family or friends together. For example, on winter days, my family will not have to work or go out so we always decide to sit in the living room to talk about our work and life and watch television. As a result, these entertainment sources can ease to access. The second benefit is that there are varieties of programs for communicators, by attending to whatever competition or gameshow they will make acquaintance and have the chance to communicate with people even they are strange. For instance, one of my favorite program-Dad where are we going, a good program for children to experience the real life, make new friends and more confidence. Consequently, television also bring people closer, people can make it as an advantage to take a part in communities impacted by it.
In conclusion, while there are some negative views about the impact of television, I do believe that the positive sides are dominated.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1496.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92105263158 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80374329322 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2513844594 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7333333333 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2666666667 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0898857737102 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0279576781059 0.084324248473 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0256467038017 0.0667982634062 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0557475671041 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0118828965879 0.056905535591 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.