Nowadays, more and more adults and children are engaging in distance-working and distance-studying since technological products have become more affordable and available for most people. I suppose that this inclination has both advantages and disadvantages, however, I believe that the advantages can be eclipsed by the drawbacks.
On the positive side, people who work and study at home via technological devices such as smartphones or laptops might have better access to the remarkable amount of information on the internet. For employees, especially office workers, they can read, find, and deal with the information easier with better wifi quality and brisker documentable procedures. For students, they may have more opportunities to research the lessons they do not understand or want to have a deeper understanding. Furthermore, learning and working from home means fewer commuters, as a brilliant result, pollution and roads' destruction could be greatly attenuated. Take Vietnam for an illustration, from April to September of 2021, the fourth wave of COVID pandemic has forced most teachers and students to stay and study from home, which helped to drag down a massive proportion of air pollution.
On the negative side, distance- working-and-learning also means less interaction among people. For short-term effects, it causes less concentration in group meetings, in classrooms lessons, and particular fluctuation in the levels of income and edification. Nevertheless, in the long run, it makes a large group of people redundant because their jobs do not rely on technology, blue-collar for instance. Learning from home also means less peer support, motivation and enthusiasm to students, and even worse, some students whose parents can not afford modern devices can easily drop out of schools, making the global education rates typically dwindle.
In conclusion, studying and working from distances latent many benefits as well as drawbacks. However, in the long run, I believe that it will bring much more negative consequences than advantages.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, thus, well, as for, for instance, i suppose, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1748.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58466453674 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25924948153 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626198083067 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1960063849 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.461538462 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0769230769 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3076923077 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309921942307 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0906626056555 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681320723183 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179310079981 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504678254734 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.07 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.