There is a good deal of evidence that increasing car use is contributing to global warming and having other undesirable effects on people’s health and well-being.
What can be done to discourage people from using their cars?
It is obvious that expanding car ownership is making a considerable contribution to not only several environmental problems but also people’s health. In this essay, I will outline two solutions which can be done to discourage people from unnecessary car use.
The first and the most effective measure that the governments can take is to make cars expensive. By imposing heavy tax on car purchasing, environment protection, and petrol consumption, people may start considering reducing car use, especially for unneeded trips. However, there is a drawback of this solution is that when the price of cars goes up, the rich are still be able to have car ownerships as they are not affected by financial burden while the poorer ones do. As a result, they cannot own a car for travelling to work.
Another action to reduce people’s car use is to organize awareness campaign to the owners about how many impacts that cars cause to the environment, and it should be viral in social media. In addition, governments should encourage their citizens to use public transportation such as buses, trams or subways. It is shown that in cities like Tokyo, Seoul, and Paris, where people would rather use alternative means of transport, the rates of traffic congestion are lower than Jakarta or Hanoi, where personal transportation is preferred.
In conclusion, increasing tax on car ownership can be an effective way to put off car use. Even so, I believe that encouraging people to use alternative transportation can be the better and more successful measure to achieve this goal.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 371, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...ice of cars goes up, the rich are still be able to have car ownerships as they are...
^^
Line 3, column 537, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e personal transportation is preferred. In conclusion, increasing tax on car own...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, may, so, still, while, even so, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1313.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0694980695 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99771084828 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.625482625483 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2706723236 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.363636364 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5454545455 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.72727272727 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.436889100772 0.244688304435 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167670584515 0.084324248473 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0894146828953 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.28362766145 0.151304729494 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0661374390117 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.