There is growing evidence that man-made activities are making global temperatures higher.
What might be the man-made causes of temperatures rising? How should we deal with this problem?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
More than ever in the past, people have been painfully aware of the fact that the major cause of global warming is mainly attributed to the actions implemented by the people, ourselves. This essay will explain some prominent man-made reasons for it and suggest ways to tackle the issue.
To begin with, the advance in today's technology and people's lifestyles changing at a fervent pace would be the primary causes of the rise of global temperature. The developments in technical aspects are certainly like a double-edged sword whereby they can make our lives to be more efficient and comforting on one hand but cause the decay of the eco-system on the other hand. The excessive amount of carbon emission and intensive offshore drilling can be shown as a few instances of how we, humans, have led the air and the water to their worst condition as ever. Apart from entrenched economies that are now moderately doing conservation projects, many developing countries would likely cut the environmental corners rather than risk falling further behind globally. Thus, the actions contributing to global warming become more widespread which is truly threatening the future generation. In addition, the dynamic nature of lifestyles of individuals also is a culprit of contemporary global warming. Chopping down the trees without control, building modern industries while sweeping off the local habitats are the reasons for deforestation and the lack of trees largely fuels the surging increase of global temperature.
Regarding the mechanisms to tackle, there are three components; government, businessmen, and the general public, to be considered as major actors to execute the actions. Firstly, governments need to impose strict yet practical sets of rules and regulations that will curb the devastation of the ecosystem in the long run. The cooperation between governments in the world is highly favorable that can lead to global environmental treaties that can deliver more sustainable impact. For instance, a global program to plant 100 trees on monthly basis in countries will not only promote the soil to be nutritious but also halt the momentum of global warming.
Next, the commercial corporates should consider promoting their products, accompanying with 'Green-rule', which is performed in accordance with environmental conservation guidelines. To cite an example, the fast-food companies can put prohibitions on the importers who do not follow certain environmental procedures. Lastly, the public needs to educate itself about the consequences of its actions towards global warming. While following the conservation mechanisms of governments such as grouping the waste products properly, people can make better choices, tuning to environmental perspectives, such as reducing the use of plastics.
To conclude, there is no doubt that humanity has caused the existential threat, which is global warming, due to their greediest attempt to exploit the earth. Therefore, the responsibility to face the problem with better solutions and approaches is also in our hands, through the collective efforts of government, business people, and the citizens.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 98, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...nents; government, businessmen, and the general public, to be considered as major actors to ex...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, lastly, regarding, so, therefore, thus, while, apart from, for instance, in addition, no doubt, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 41.998997996 164% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2673.0 1615.20841683 165% => OK
No of words: 486.0 315.596192385 154% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69525374022 4.20363070211 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02628174084 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 289.0 176.041082164 164% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594650205761 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 819.9 506.74238477 162% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 11.0 2.52805611222 435% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.2800739706 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.684210526 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5789473684 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.84210526316 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152206553594 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0418411753468 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383839270412 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0804269499687 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366916303448 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 157.0 78.4519038076 200% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.