These days people in some countries are living in a “throw-away” society which means people use things in a short time then throw them away. Causes and problems.
Nowadays, people love to do shopping many items for a short time period, which increases many problems for the environment and their lives. In this essay, I will argue all problems of throw-away society creates and possible solutions to reduce these problems.
One of the most critical problems of these behaviors is creating much waste of household electronic devices in the environment. People dumped all mobile phones, fridges, microwaves, and many more into dustbins when they find a new highly upgraded version of these. Therefore, these E-wastes make the environment more polluted by emitting various gases such as carbon, nitrogen, and so on. An air conditioner, for example, releases carbon monoxide into the air, when they break down. Hence, the more waste is available in nature, the greater problems will occur in living conditions.
To reducing these critical problems, some ways are available. Firstly, people need to understand to use their old devices with repairing at their homes, offices instead of buying ones. This may lead to reduce the number of electronic garbages. If the company uses all these old items for recycling, it will encourage people to give these items to factories rather than dumping them. A survey by apple, for example, showed that nearly 90% of their customers gave their old iPhones to recycling when the organization decided to use only recycled materials in their products. Ultimately, the more people become aware of recycling, the more the atmosphere becomes clearer.
In conclusion, the throw-aways society creating many problems to the environmental level and health level to people. But solutions such as recycling and repairing old ones instead of buying will reduce these situations’ effects.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1479.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35869565217 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7117405014 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590579710145 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.2029913096 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242017828368 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754318653942 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622592984839 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15523708931 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0639250786633 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.