Today digital and industrial robotic
technologies are converging at a rapid
pace. Do the advantages of this
convergence outweigh its disadvantages?
Discuss.
Support your ideas with the latest
evidence/study findings.
People have different views about how rapidly digital and industrial robotic technologies are evolving. Although this convergence is of course beneficial, I still agree with those who think that disadvantages of this process outweigh its disadvantages.
There are several reasons why robotic technologies is significant. Firstly, industrial automated robots have the capacity to dramatically improve quality of production because of its precision and high repeatability every time. Secondly, digital technologies may increase working speed, and works at a constant speed, without any break, pausing or vacations, so it has the potential to work more than human. Finally, with digital and automated technologies, human no longer has to travail in hazardous workspace, and moves to supervisory roles.
However, I would think that rapid convergence of industrial robotic technologies causes more disadvantages than what significant it is. It is evidently that the more digital technologies are, the more the costs of them is. Owners also have to buy new equipment or spend money to repair when machines need to fixed. With digital technologies, we work in less time, or just wait for automatic process. It makes us be sluggish and inactive. When technologies are used in entertainment, digital amusement will be created. We will use our leisure for these digital entertainments, become more inactive and do not want to work anymore. In the other hand, digital technologies can be used in crimes, it is very dangerous.
In conclusion, although the convergence of digital and industrial robotic technologies has some advantages, but its advantages cannot overweigh its disadvantages.
Comments
Let me introduce you to the…
Let me introduce you to the unique and compelling Horror Game happy wheels. Happy Wheels is a fantastic recommendation for you if you enjoy playing spooky games.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, as to, in conclusion, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60392156863 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25299731659 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607843137255 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.3843736638 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2666666667 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182844028616 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059910363777 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513538803923 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134762751575 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455616935977 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.9 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.