Today, in many countries, people can live and work anywhere they choose because of improved communication technology and transportation. Do the advantages of this development outweigh its disadvantages?
The modern world full of innovative inventions has changed the way people live in comparison that in the past. Thanks to technology and transportation enhancement, it is free to choose places to live or work in a country. Along with some advantages this brings, there are also significant drawbacks.
On the one hand, the modern technology allows employees to work remotely even from their home and stay connected to the company during and after working hours. If there are urgent announcements or important notices, the information will be widely disseminated to every individual. This consequently helps to boost the information processing within the company especially when multinational corporations need to address customers' requests quickly. Moreover, a lot of cost on fuel could be saved since workers use less transport to travel to work. Problems of traffic jam in most cities are more likely to be solved, possibly reducing the level of urban pollution.
On the other hand, the increased mobility in the workplace does impose a number of constraints on both employees and their companies. From the perspective of the employees, the delineation between their work and personal activities is rather indistinguishable. In other words, housework and family time are among the reasons preventing employees from fully concentrating on their work. Regarding the businesses, this issue comes with different challenges in human resource management because the company finds it difficult to supervise their workers off company campus. For example, punctuation is a big matter when it comes to many people from different countries attending one conference.
In conclusion, despite the benefits of modern technology and transportation allowing people to live and work anywhere, I strongly believe its negative side is more considerable.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, moreover, regarding, so, for example, in conclusion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1564.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54609929078 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14681898029 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617021276596 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.4881505084 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 111.714285714 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1428571429 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202896730428 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0644839437706 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606370202278 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135642045446 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059080180792 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.