Today more and more people are using mobile phones and computers. Thus, people are losing the ability to communicate face to face. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is a truth that the number of people using mobile phones and computers is increasing rapidly. While accepting the huge benefits these devices bring to our life, I also believe that this is the main factor reducing our communication ability.
On the one hand, there are numerous advantages we can gain from mobile phones and computers. Firstly, communication with people becomes much more easily thank to these electronic devices. They allow us to talk or send a written massage to anyone without seeing them in person. For instance, there are a lot of business meetings are taken place through video conferencing in order to decrease time and costs gathering attendances together. An other positive effect of these devices is that they improve people’s productivity at work. A typical example is that the development of accounting at the present depends largely on the completion of computer system.
On the other hand, I agree to claim mobile phones and computers for the declining of people communication ability. People are spending more and more time on using smart phones or computers, which leads to the lack of time for connecting face to face with others. For example, young students usually prefer surfing the internet or playing online games rather than hanging out with their friends after school time. This tendency will be followed by misunderstanding and isolation when they have to talk to someone or a group of people.
In conclusion, the benefits of technical devices such as mobile phones or computers are really obvious, however they still have some negative effects on our communication ability.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 440, Rule ID: AN_OTHER[1]
Message: Did you mean 'another'? This word sequence is usually spelled together.
Suggestion: Another
...d costs gathering attendances together. An other positive effect of these devices is tha...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, really, so, still, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1374.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20454545455 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77429993486 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602272727273 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.6476245181 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.692307692 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3076923077 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6153846154 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257707788964 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.08871549098 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103572765494 0.0667982634062 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143209333044 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0689488426609 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.