In today’s world of advanced science and technology, we still greatly value our artists such as musicians, painters and writers. What can art tell us about life that science and technology cannot?
In the present, technology and advanced science are some of the main reasons in making a humans’ life easier than in the past. But there are a number of things only learn from. In this essay, I will argue that a person’s thoughts we can learn from his work and how humans have done many things in the past.
To beginning with, when we show historic art of great personalities from the past, we can learn what he thinks about a particular scene. This may lead many learners to understand many aspects of historical events. For example, many historical events across India, learn by Many books like Mahabharata, Ramayana and many more. Hence, the more we learn from art from the past, the greater it will help us understand mankind.
On the same hand, when people show great works from painters, musicians, and writers, people will learn about where we are and how we surpassed many problems in the past and this may lead to a better understanding of the behavior of humans. For example, arts from caves in Egypt had shown people who done amazing work done by without technology or science in ancient times and their events. Hence, these works provide evidence about humans can do anything without any technical assistance.
In conclusion, although technology and science have many benefits to humans as well as other species, arts provides deeper meanings about when we rise and what we archived in the last centuries without any technology. It only can be learned from historical works.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 53, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...nt, technology and advanced science are some of the main reasons in making a humans’ life e...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, may, so, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1244.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.859375 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4929588344 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54296875 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 377.1 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.8081566913 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.666666667 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191585271738 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0778583604185 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067741615197 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136966363384 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335680215143 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 78.4519038076 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.