Too much emphasis is placed on going university for academic study. People should be encouraged to do vocational training, because there is a lack of qualified tradespeople such as electricians or plumbers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that entering university for academic field plays an important role in many young people. While I accept that this may suit for many people, I believe that we should encourage more people to become professional manual works like electricians or plumbers.
On the one hand, there are some reasons why many students choose the universities or colleges to study. Firstly, they can broaden their own knowledge in terms of the law, finance and banking. As they have countless opportunities to learn several supported subjects around their specialization, they will be relatively confident in society. Secondly, they will have the higher career choices to choose a good job compared to vocational students. The prime example for this is Vietnamese university students, he can graduate with a bachelor’s degree in banking, but he still is an employee as an accountant or a tax officer.
On the other hand, people should be promoted to attend vocational training classes because of some reasons. One reason is that they can start their professional careers sooner than their fellows. To be specific, while college students have to commit at least 3 years to graduate, vocational schools take only 1 to 2 years for students to receive certain specialised certifications and apply this sort of knowledge to earn a living. In addition, in many countries, there is an existing imbalance in the economy, resulting in graduate unemployment, compared to at the same time there is a shortage of skilled labour. Hence, governments in those countries should provide extra vocational training courses to create essential manual workers.
In conclusion, it is certainly true that studying in the university to pursue academic study is one of the paths to success, but this is by no means vocational education should not be encouraged to develop.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, while, at least, in addition, in conclusion, sort of, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1549.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19798657718 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9799507969 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593959731544 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0901188143 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.153846154 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4615384615 7.06120827912 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162239545629 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0568178824304 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501565648494 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108758504796 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354293853482 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.