topic: Nowadays the way people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development?
It is true that nowadays, the development of technology is taken to human being interact with each other easy. However, the equipment also affect relationships people by some ways.
It can not deny that the machinery is getting more and more advance provide many opportunity. Firstly, a lot social media such as facebook, instargram.. distance between people to people become closer. For instance, When a person is living or working in afar region, many couples have long- distance, talking facetime make us feel they always beside, which share stories everyday. Secondly, communicating exchanged information afar, before, it was difficult, what only began by using letter, telegram... it takes many time to transmit important news to someone. But, the technology has promoted not only fast but also exactly at any time in the world. Even, often update information, the people can understand precise if having any problems.
On the other hand, there are a variety reason why has technology affected the types of relationship people make. First, the indirect communication through phone' screen get less flexible ability in touch with each other. Further, the high- tec technology become modern, the people do rather depend on smart phone so much than discover staight things, Many young people are addicted them, after being controlled due to spending time on internet, This affect directly to some relationship reality.
In conclusion, it seems that there are any season for positive but some are contrary. But, all will impact many human by other different ways.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 77, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun opportunity seems to be countable; consider using: 'many opportunities'.
Suggestion: many opportunities
...s getting more and more advance provide many opportunity. Firstly, a lot social media such as fa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 150, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...ocial media such as facebook, instargram.. distance between people to people becom...
^^
Line 2, column 153, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Distance
...al media such as facebook, instargram.. distance between people to people become closer....
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 371, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...they always beside, which share stories everyday. Secondly, communicating exchanged info...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 513, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'many times'.
Suggestion: many times
...n by using letter, telegram... it takes many time to transmit important news to someone. ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 44, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'seasons'?
Suggestion: seasons
...conclusion, it seems that there are any season for positive but some are contrary. But...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1318.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 249.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29317269076 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66990658167 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.690763052209 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.8049778743 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.8666666667 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313396824117 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0946060746139 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100158299704 0.0667982634062 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188974741657 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114084921901 0.056905535591 200% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.