Tourism has increased enormously in the last five decades. Some people believe this increased tourism bought many advantages to the society while others oppose this argument. I believe detrimental effects of the tourism is more than its advantages. This essay examines both sides of this argument.
To begin with, the first and foremost positive development that tourism bought is job opportunities flourished. Many youngsters in the local areas got jobs such as tourist guide, selling local crafts. Earnings from these jobs helps them to run their family smoothly. Secondly, tourists can know different cultures because nowadays every open their doors widely before the tourists. Thus, their culture will become internationally well known. For example, the local art forms in India now word widely accepted thorough the tourists.
On the contrary, all the above mentioned benefits of tourism can be conquered with its disadvantages side. Firstly, with the soaring tourism pollution also went up tremendously. Waste products piled up everywhere and this causes dangerous diseases such as malaria, swine flu . Another important negative effect of tourism is local culture will be affected by the tourist from different parts of the world. Local believes and rituals will soon vanish and western culture will be followed by the people
Thus, I strongly believe increased tourism has more negative impacts than its positive impacts
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...widely accepted thorough the tourists. On the contrary, all the above mentione...
^^^
Line 5, column 276, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...rous diseases such as malaria, swine flu . Another important negative effect of to...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, as to, for example, such as, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1217.0 1615.20841683 75% => OK
No of words: 220.0 315.596192385 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53181818182 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62837899843 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640909090909 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 374.4 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0336980634 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.1333333333 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6666666667 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196421386173 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0651101958149 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576661972897 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131115933222 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046777189667 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.2 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.