traditional values can be wiped out in modern life.some people think that traditional values can be ripped out because of the development of technology. to what extent do you agree or disagree?
The old values have played an important role in social development. Some people think that they have faded away and been replaced by completely new values. I believe that both old and new ones are co-exist to complete each other.
To begin with, the world has become flatter and more and more people are assimilating into the world’s cultures. It is common to catch sight of one person can speak several languages and singing a foreign song. However, while many people are imbued with other cultures, others still are loyal to traditional value by preserving ancient houses or holding traditional holidays. In fact, the emphasis on the conventional values is to keep people the aware of their origin and arouse them in sense of pride. Without knowing where they belong to, the younger are likely vulnerable to disorientation and lured into social vice.
However, traditional heritages and items are well-preserved thanks to the non-stop development of technology. It is obvious that historical items and samples such as skeletons or stone tools throughout thousands of years of evolution still maintain their own appearance and shape because they are protected in favorable conditions with chemical substances and cutting-edge machinery. Thanks to these historical evidences, people would dig deeper into understanding their ancestors. In addition, by displaying them in the public like museums, governments are able to earn huge revenue. To the end, this enormous amount of money are probably allocated to other key sectors and especially pouring more money into preserving and promoting traditional values.
In conclusion, no matter how fast technology develops, their own culture still remains and makes contribution to form a civilized society.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, still, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1487.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34892086331 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80430002837 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651079136691 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3664631699 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.214285714 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8571428571 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92857142857 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136404493975 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0423741766102 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.042337332257 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0658048204531 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469994020608 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.