Traffic and housing problems could be solved by moving large companies, factories and their employees to the countryside. Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, traffic and housing-related problems are highly debatable. Some say that companies, factories, and their employees need to move to rural areas, while others do not agree with the statement. In this essay, I will explain both sides of the argument and why I think it is not an appropriate way.
To comments with people who think that all organizations, factories, and workers need to move in countrysides because it provides better accessibility of services to other citizens in the city. When all companies and their factories are located far from the city, the traffic of roads will decrease, resulting in faster access in hospitals, parks, shops and many more for people. For example, all production companies in Anand city located the outside area of the town, native people accessed medical and learning places very easier. Hence, the less traffic on the road, the fewer accidents will happen, the more people rapidly reach their destinations in cities.
On the other side, others and I, however, believe that if all working places are available in the countrysides, it will increase pollution and harm nature. This transportation of raw materials and workers will increase, leading to rising in the use of fuels. A survey, for instance, has shown that companies, which located in rural areas in China, these companies spent 75% of their capital on the transportation of raw products than other companies from metropolitan areas. And contributed 85% more in pollutions as well. Therefore, the more fuel used, the more damages happen to the environment.
In conclusion, when companies move to villages, although people have access to all their destinations in a faster way, it will the usage of petrol and diesel will increase. This may result in environmental damages. In my words, despite having benefits for people, companies need to locate in towns to reduce transport and use of fuels.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1603.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17096774194 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85768766175 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561290322581 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8478114828 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.866666667 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13333333333 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166274587591 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0538397297304 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588658758913 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109854502672 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059320789446 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.