TV is harmful for children To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

TV is harmful for children. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is widely argued that watching TV can hurt children. Although I believe that TV is absolutely charming for every child, it has many drawbacks which threaten their health as well as wasting their time.
The most compelling reason for holding to my view is that watching TV programs can have some bad effects on health condition especially in children. It is because of the physical harm through sitting down in front of the TV for a long time. To illustrate this, some health problems: eye strain, discomfort and blurred vision that are common complaints. Moreover, physical damage is not only about eyesight but also about increasing obesity among children who spend a great deal of time on watching TV programs that leads to fewer physical activities.
Another reason for my position is that TV wastes children’s time and lead them to shirk their responsibilities. As TV producers try to make attractive programs, many children devote a great deal of time and energy to them. So, a child would not have extra time to take part in useful and essential activities such as doing sports, reading books and doing homework. Nor will they lose and lag their significant duties.
In conclusion, Despite being entertaining, I believe that TV is a harmful trend for children since many physical disadvantages and lack of time are observed.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (2 votes)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1115.0 1615.20841683 69% => OK
No of words: 224.0 315.596192385 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97767857143 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77622223842 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607142857143 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 328.5 506.74238477 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7477668032 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.363636364 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3636363636 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27272727273 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237802242789 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0977346910429 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590071556709 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158056363281 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0172738989256 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 78.4519038076 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1115.0 1615.20841683 69% => OK
No of words: 224.0 315.596192385 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97767857143 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77622223842 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607142857143 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 328.5 506.74238477 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7477668032 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.363636364 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3636363636 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27272727273 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237802242789 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0977346910429 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590071556709 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158056363281 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0172738989256 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 78.4519038076 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.