The unlimited use of cars may cause many problems. What are those problems? In order to reduce the problems should we discourage pEople to use cars.
Nowadays, having a car plays an integral part in many people’s lives. Not only does it offer the utilities to our life but it also supplies ready access to many far places and a variety of services and leisure options. Nevertheless, a range of problems due to the infinite use of cars have been identified and need to be addressed.
First and foremost, the issues associated with frequent car use have become increasingly prominent to general public. The incremental usage of cars is the main cause of environmental pollution as well as green house gas emissions. As a result, climate change and global warming are one of the most challenging problems facing the entire world. Besides, it also can have adverse impact on the health and well-being of people. Furthermore, more and more people are likely to drive to work rather than cycle or walk or take public transports, which can lead to heavy traffic congestion almost every day in rush hour. This may make people feel tired, or frustrated and stressful when they are caught in traffic jam so often for many hours a day. Consequently, the productivity of their work or study may be negatively affected.
Therefore, these problems need to be tackled as soon as possible. Initially, it is often argued that the government should impose strict restriction on the use of cars. However, I do not believe that it is a productive method on the grounds that it may lead to reduced mobility for people as well as a sharp decline in the car industry. As an alternative to this solution, I highly recommend that it would be much better for car manufactures to design more environmentally friendly car as well as cars powered by renewable resources. Moreover, we should hold workshops or campaigns to raise people’s understanding about these issues so that they will be much more conscious of their responsibility to alleviate these matters by means of using public transports or cycling to work …
To sum up, even though discouraging people from using cars mish be a quick solution, It is not likely to be a permanent cure.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 104, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...e have become increasingly prominent to general public. The incremental usage of cars is the m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, as a result, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1732.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87887323944 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91561406838 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583098591549 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.8339120857 49.4020404114 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.466666667 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0666666667 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27642716707 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0825354602866 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502953347745 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165845761024 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333518347546 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.