The use of social media is replacing face-to-face interaction among many people in society. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
A question many people have to ask themselves is whether spending time on social media platforms have been overshadowed direct communication. On one hand, i am inclined to believe that social media is the crucial key for human-being to be able to keep in contact in a flexible way. On the other hand, hardly can we deny that face-to-face interacting have enhanced positive feelings among people.
To assess if social media is truly essential, we must bring the advantages of this trend into focus. Assuming an individual had a crave for conversation with his relatives or acquaintances, social media like Facebook, Zalo or even Instagram definitely would be the best options. Not only can such social media support the users in creating bonding between their family members through video calls in a long distance, but it can also decrease the chances of meaningless arguments. In addition, using Facebook is the best way to get stuff out of our chest, which barely wasting a few second. Another benefit is that we do not need a cafe or a room to share our depression, one thing we have to do is turning on our laps or mobile phones and make the phone call.
Although so far, one can readily draw the conclusion that media platform is beneficial, we must put the function of oral face-to-face communication into perspective before judging whether one play an important role than the other. Gathering at one place, a person will have more chances or wise words to persuade or convince high-status people instead of impolite video calling. For instance, it makes sense when a candidate applies his resume to a gigantic enterprise, he must go there in person because the employers can interact with him and be well aware if he should be recruited or not. On top of that, when it comes to the advantage of meeting bodily, eyes never lie.
Taking both sides into consideration, they point me to the conclusion that but in principle, communication in person is outperforming better, in practice due to living in digital age, a person can suppose that social media is the winner.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 156, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...owed direct communication. On one hand, i am inclined to believe that social medi...
^
Line 1, column 264, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a flexible way" with adverb for "flexible"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...man-being to be able to keep in contact in a flexible way. On the other hand, hardly can we deny ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... into focus. Assuming an individual had a crave for conversation with his relatives or ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 579, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun second seems to be countable; consider using: 'few seconds'.
Suggestion: few seconds
...ut of our chest, which barely wasting a few second. Another benefit is that we do not need...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, so, well, for instance, in addition, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1726.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86197183099 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81970846054 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614084507042 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.9785607004 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.769230769 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3076923077 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15384615385 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208517319928 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06903980915 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049619498092 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11833450513 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598199844007 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.