The use of violence in music lyrics, video games and films seen by children is causing concern in many societies. What problems may be caused by this type of violent imagery, and what steps could be taken to lessen the impact on young people?
Few issues are more important than the psychological growth of the young population. In light of this, there have been existent anxieties on the grave consequences of violent visual contents on children in our present world. This essay thus seeks to discuss the dangers attributed to this emerging menace, as well as the probable solutions to reducing them.
To start with, there is an almost universal consensus that constant exposure of young minds to violent imagery seems to portend a substantial risk to their physical, social and mental well-being. The major concern about this culture is perceivably the tendency to ultimately culminate in an aggressive and criminal lifestyle on the long term. This despicable trait, seen in countries such as the USA with a high level of youth crime, demonstrates the deleterious extent to which this impacts on the developing human. In addition, prolonged indulgence in vulgar contents appears to undermine the sanity of the formative process of the growing young child, and hence, consequently deals a terrible blow on how the adult life would seemingly be.
Turning to possible remedies, perhaps the most preeminent initiative to counteract this crisis would be the active role of the government in that enacting stringent policies aimed at censoring virtual media. This would largely reduce the production of pysche-decaying imageries, coupled with the unguarded exposure to them. Another vital key in addressing this challenge would be the promotion of more educative, yet entertaining, programs targeted especially at youthful age groups, which would correctively appropriate their adventurous minds. Parents should also, in the spirit of devout responsibility, avail themselves to spending quality time with their wards, and control what piques their interests.
In final words, the flagrant demerits of childhood exposure to violent media works constitute a significant threat to their eventual practical lifestyle. As such, the government and parents alike, have a tremendous role to play to arrest this blistering societal pitfall.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, in addition, such as, as well as, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1774.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56112852665 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94865872899 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645768025078 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7491806248 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.461538462 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5384615385 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61538461538 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142386610542 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0449773204526 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0170614696088 0.0667982634062 26% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0771821265815 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302108330157 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.92 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.