The users of social media, such as Facebook, Twitter, are replacing face-to-face contact in this century. Do you think the advantages of this way outweigh the disadvantages?
It is argued by some that advanced technology equipment in communication, especially social media has a negative effect on the direct interaction among people. In my opinion, the disadvantages of this trend outweigh the advantage.
There is no doubt that people derive substantial benefits from gaining access to the social networks. Firstly, the dominant of using technological devices gives users countless opportunities to exchange socially. For example, Facebook, Twitters and Zalo are platforms which allow people instant messaging and one can easily contact others by transforming information into Facebook, Messenger regardless of geographical barriers. It is convenient for those who live far away from their loved ones. Secondly, communication facilities available on Facebook are powerful tools in enhancing the productivity's work. For instance, in the field of economy, business managers can easily provide customer service, answer sales question and even upload new brands of the company through social networking service. As a result, this can result in quickly and efficiently exchanging information rather than holding the private meeting.
However, there are some existing drawbacks of communication equipment abuse to direct interaction in real society. In the digital age, with the emergence of other social networking websites, people are disappearing and replacing the traditional way of interaction with electronic ones. For example, it is common to see many youths make cycle virtual friend online via Facebook or Zalo instead of gathering at a small shop for their meeting. This can lead to isolating people from other social members, weakened the sense of community and even get a serious feeling of pain and mental health problems when making strange people. Secondly, the ability of people such as literacy skills and social etiquettes are gradually declining due to the lack of the informal way of transmitting the message and social exposure. For example, the majority of youngsters prefer making their feelings and emotions by using emoticons and abbreviations rather than expressing themselves through their verbal or gestures.
In conclusion, I believe that this trend brings more disadvantages than advantages it brings. It is advisable that people should take into consideration in less using of modern communication equipment.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2016.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69491525424 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01564753233 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607344632768 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 635.4 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6512824477 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.588235294 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8235294118 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88235294118 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181944643366 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0547134284867 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525367794288 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114456548068 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0225744781754 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.11 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.