As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. Do you agree or disagree?
There is an increasingly growing interest in social corporate responsibility among enterprises in recent years. Yet, there remains some disagreement as to whether the overall effect of this trend has been positive or negative. While there are valid arguments to the contrary arguing that social corporate responsibility is obviously a waste of resources, I personally believe that it is business's mission to both create profits and to take care of society.
On the one hand, the efforts of companies to maximize their profits may have some benefits for society as a whole. Not only does it contribute enormously to the government's tax but it also creates more job vacancies for citizens. Thanks to their tax contribution, it relieves partial financial burdens with the society that consequently leads to enhancement in medical services, education as well as country infrastructure. Furthermore, more job opportunities will definitely make the unemployment rate far less severe. A country with low unemployment rate will eliminate starving and crimes which in consequence increase quality of life.
Equally importantly, businesses should also accept that they have social responsibilities. The first reason is that their activities have an impact on the environment. Many businesses develop in the expense of serious environmental degradation including global warming stemming from factory emissions or the irresponsible disposal of industrial waste. Nevertheless, if factories installed waste treatment systems instead of discharging chemical wastes into rivers, water pollution could be controlled.
By way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm my position that enterprises should conduct their business in a socially responsible manner. If it were not for sustainable resources, enterprises would struggle to achieve a sustainable growth rate.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 150, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...s. Yet, there remains some disagreement as to whether the overall effect of this trend has be...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
...onsequence increase quality of life. Equally importantly, businesses should also acc...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, so, well, while, as to, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1583.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.79853479853 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30919489315 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.673992673993 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8854121993 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.071428571 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15395418012 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507793092791 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726128062093 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0792387556071 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423833913083 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 50.2224549098 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.36 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.54 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.