The development of technology never stops it steps, and it has been constantly changing the way of people’s life. Some say it is meaningless to keep the traditional skills alive. Though some traditional ways are outdated, I believe that others are still useful and should be carried forward.
In many ways, the history of civilisation is the history of technology, from using fire to steering wheel to surfing the Internet, human beings have experienced tremendous changes of doing things. Airplanes allow Doctors without Borders to ahead to remote and underdeveloped areas, helping people there be away from illnesses. And with advanced modern medical science, some lethal diseases like smallpox, diphtheria and malaria are no longer threats to human lives. Most impressively, the Internet affects our life in every aspect. For example, businessmen now have meetings with whom live in other countries through the screens in front of them, and consumers can make online orders to buy variety of products made in anywhere.
Certainly, people won’t step back to live in a cave, while we cannot deny that preserving traditions is an important part in cultural inheritance. All nations have their own traditions manifesting their culture which have been maintained as well as passed down from generation to generation. Today, as an ancient skill, traditional Chinese medicine still active in medical practice due to well preservation and continuously improvement. Besides, in recent Covid-19 pandemic, it has been proved that TCM has significant effectiveness in treatment for those who have mild symptoms, saving thousands of lives from getting worse or even death. Moreover, other traditional skills like tai-chi, judo and yoga occupy a place in modern age as well.
In conclusion, despite the thriving of technology, we should not overlook the significance of some traditions and it is essential to keep them alive.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, look, moreover, so, still, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1629.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41196013289 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91621692341 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661129568106 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9078191525 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.357142857 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142009421303 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0519362068351 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468234159141 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0979384649006 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0567938625107 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.