When people succeed, it is because of hard work. Luck has nothing to do with success. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is sometimes argued that the key factor leads to the success is working hard and there is no presence of luck. While I completely agree with this statement, I do not believe that the success of people is only because of diligence.
First of all, conscientiousness is primary step to achieve dream. When working hard, people will gain experience and even at risk, they will mature. For example, Harland Sanders – the founder of KFC, before his success when he was sixty-years old, he always tried his best despite of many times of unsuccess. Therefore, to reach the success, people will hitch their wagon to a star and never give up. The next reason is no one becomes prosperous without having enough knowledge and indolent will be eliminated since there are many graduated people around; it’s hard to be capture attention. So individuals must advance their education and improve themselves. If someone has a good position in a large company despite of lacking of well-educated, he will be asked to resign soon.
However, it can be seen from the opposite angle. In some case, when people work hard at a job where the boss doesn't value their efforts, all their hard work gets them is taken for granted. As a result, just working hard by itself will exhaust them and shorten their lifespan without any benefits to them. At school, for example, students sometimes get good marks by luck if their teachers mark the students wrong.
In conclusion, I believe that without working hard and having luck, people can not make their ambition come true.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 110, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...eople work hard at a job where the boss doesnt value their efforts, all their hard wor...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1296.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87218045113 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54533211702 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.62030075188 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 390.6 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3854713677 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5714285714 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21428571429 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245567973748 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0811841801977 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0824881844926 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176830045703 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0972931252692 0.056905535591 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.