Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is a common belief that any success is greatly contributed by fortune. However, I completely oppose this viewpoint as accomplishment or failure are both generated by people themselves through their hard work and acknowledgment
On the one hand, it is undeniable that people determine their own lives by their own decisions. To be exact, there are some unfortunate individuals who are born with innate illnesses like limbs-loss or cardiovascular diseases still manage to have a decent life or even more flourish than normal people. For instance: Nick Vujik - an Australian speaker who is worldwide popular for his motivating story from the beginning of a child losing all 4 limbs to the greatest influencer who owns a company and has a happy family. As a result, some people do not happen to succeed as there is obviously no luck in their processes but totally by their own endeavors
On the other hand, it is knowledge and diligence that play a key role in people’s accomplishments. Specifically, by accumulating more knowledge and soft skills, people are able to handle more issues, make more sensible decisions and hence reach their goals faster. For example, luck can not bring people a diploma which is significant for a company’s applicant, nonetheless, it can be taken by studying and practice. Consequently, although luck sometimes can make certain shifts to one's work, without great persistence and an open mind, they are less likely to reach their targets
To conclude, although luck is believed to have substantial impacts on people’s accomplishments, I still strongly disagree with it since luck can not stay with any individual permanently but only their abilities that can assure their future
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 441, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'sometimes' is usually put before the verb 'luck'.
Suggestion: sometimes luck
...ng and practice. Consequently, although luck sometimes can make certain shifts to ones work, w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, however, if, nonetheless, so, still, for example, for instance, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1452.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22302158273 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06849811511 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629496402878 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 20.2975951904 168% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 90.1401686264 49.4020404114 182% => OK
Chars per sentence: 181.5 106.682146367 170% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.75 20.7667163134 167% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.0 7.06120827912 212% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118939843186 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0462940629801 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485138762963 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0741330444675 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0360941550898 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.5 13.0946893788 157% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.97 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.59 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.1190380762 154% => OK
text_standard: 21.0 10.7795591182 195% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.