Who's to blame for animals' extinction?
Nowadays, animals are jeopardized with extinction, which, as of late, has concocted a deliberation on why this cataclysm surfaced from scratch. As far as I’ve known, I believe that there exist three main contributors.
Among them, human is the major culprit that pulls the trigger against animals. Poaching, vivisection, research, hunting,… and the likes are all grave ramifications that we pose for our amiable friends. Moreover, stoking oil into the fire, we’ve plundered their life egregiously; annihilating multitudes of them, then rendered legions of them extinct. Our act which is lack of circumspection ostensibly pertains to the accelerating velocity of animal decimation. Although several stipulations are set in motion, the government and other competent authorities fail to help other creatures keep smugglers at bay.
On the other hand, another cause to this propensity is the law of nature, the survival of the fittest, where the cutthroat battlefield of wildlife prevails harmonious cohabitation. For instance, Megalodon is the most notorious and malicious hunter ever known in history, yet they still succumbed to extinction at the hand of white sharks- an inferior creature compared to them, for they could no longer scour their food while their counterpart could. Furthermore, climate shifts also wreak havoc on animals: Titanoboa perished as the weather got more sweltering. In the case of dinosaurs, an unexpected meteorite crashed the Earth, which transpires rarely. These factors beget unmooring upshots to the point where all creatures are confined and embattled.
In conclusion, I think we should take action forthrightly to preserve the natural habitats and boost the prolific procreation of these wild animals; or else, what beckons is viably an avalanche of ineffable repercussions, a fair comeuppance meted out to us for marring what belongs to Mother Nature.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
...Poaching, vivisection, research, hunting,… and the likes are all grave ramificatio...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, still, then, while, for instance, i think, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1615.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58823529412 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05191096045 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.716262975779 0.561755894193 128% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.488331494 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.230769231 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124828100526 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0316048187846 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0379594668633 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0638961597033 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0200815126067 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.46 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.