Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people believe that wild animals are of no benefit to humans, so they do not deserve to be protected. Personally, I completely disagree with this idea.
Firstly, wild animals help us to broaden our knowledge of science such as biology and medicine. By studying animals kept in captivity, like those in zoos, or living in their natural habitats, scientists can know more about how different parts of living organisms work together to maintain life as well as improve their understanding of evolution. Also, the bones and organs of some mammals, such as tigers, rhinos and bears, are used in traditional methods to treat certain illnesses in some countries. Therefore, it is not a waste of money but a beneficial and necessary thing for us to do.
Secondly, preserving wildlife is protecting biodiversity. Humans, animals, fishes, plants and bacteria are all related through the food chains. If some types of animals in a particular area died out, the biodiversity would become imbalanced, and some species would dramatically increase or decrease in quantity. As a result, all organisms in that area would be detrimentally affected, including humans. To prevent this from happening, we have to protect endangered animals through zoos, natural parks, laws that ban illegal animal hunting, and conservation campaigns funded by governments all around the world.
In conclusion, it seems to me that animals living in their natural habitats are advantageous to us and even play an important role in maintaining biodiversity, so we should step up efforts and do everything we can to protect them.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1346.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2373540856 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97175915591 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.645914396887 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.4299349601 49.4020404114 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.166666667 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4166666667 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179263555813 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0606045526748 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551536708218 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115134761622 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469208271759 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.