Wild animals have no place in the 21st century. So protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree agree?
These days, people think it is point less to spend money and time on preserving wild animals'natural habitat because they do not have any benefits for us. I completely disagree with this point of view.
In my own view, it is absurd that we humans have no need for wild animals. I think the planet earth has enough space for all of creatures. it is not fair and ethical to destroy their homes to accommodation and feed people. In other words, there is no compelling reason to destroy their haven to widen our routs , uproot trees to build up houses and furniture. there is no need to exploit every last squrae meter of jungle and other wild animals'habitat. I can not imagine what our planet would be like without them and their habitats. we should make a better and more humane world.
I also disagree with the idea that protecting animals is a waste of resources. When we try to conserve a habitat in fact, we avoid disrupting the balance of ecosystem and earth. As result , its advantages back to humans. In my opinion that it is governments duty to monitor closely the changes and should take some practical measures to avoid illegal hunting or defrostation. it is vitally important to organise guards to protect wild animals homes and have harsher punishment for those who break the laws. Furthermore., provide an artificial habitat for those which are classed as an endangered species. I believe it could be effective to teach childern about this issue and aware people about consequences of destroying fragile habitat.
In conclusion, it is not reasonable to think wild animals have no place in this century or protecting them is ridiculous. Preventing loss of natural habitat could help to survive our lonely planet. So all of us, in particular governors should consider the inevitable results of poaching and defrostation and pass strict punishments for law breakers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 140, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... has enough space for all of creatures. it is not fair and ethical to destroy thei...
^^
Line 9, column 215, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oy their homes to accommodation and feed people. In other words, there is no comp...
^^
Line 9, column 312, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...o destroy their haven to widen our routs , uproot trees to build up houses and fur...
^^
Line 9, column 362, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...trees to build up houses and furniture. there is no need to exploit every last squrae...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 536, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...e like without them and their habitats. we should make a better and more humane wo...
^^
Line 15, column 154, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in fact, we avoid disrupting the balance of ecosystem and earth. As result , its ...
^^
Line 15, column 189, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...lance of ecosystem and earth. As result , its advantages back to humans. In my op...
^^
Line 15, column 378, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... avoid illegal hunting or defrostation. it is vitally important to organise guards...
^^
Line 15, column 509, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...unishment for those who break the laws. Furthermore., provide an artificial habitat for tho...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 25, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... In conclusion, it is not reasonable to think wild animals have no...
^^
Line 25, column 150, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s ridiculous. Preventing loss of natural habitat could help to survive our lonely...
^^
Line 25, column 269, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...governors should consider the inevitable results of poaching and defrostation and...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so, i think, in conclusion, in fact, in particular, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97178683386 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76807361515 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605015673981 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.3692208001 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.4736842105 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7894736842 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47368421053 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 5.01903807615 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.9879759519 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194919707884 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0565291491866 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0804603091482 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114149836695 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0292388641561 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.