The world has seen an enormous increase in flight for leisure, business and commercial purposes around the world over recent years. What do you think are the main advantages and disadvantages of such flights? Do you think flights should be taxed more?
Lately, the usage of aeroplanes has soared substantially for commercial and social affairs due to many productive reasons. However, every rose has its thorns, which are capable of being removed by levying additional taxes on airlines.
Airlines are the wings of trade. As businesses are enabled to penetrate the global market, now a variety of services and products are available at consumers' disposal backed by the visible hand of airlines. Furthermore, aviation is encouraging tourism and bolstering national economies. Presently tourism is not only allowing national and international tourists to venture in the geographically isolated wilderness, but it is also promoting the foreign exchange. Perhaps, which had not been possible without the advent of aeroplanes.
Nothing comes without imperfections. Damage to the environment is the principal outcome of aviation. Aeroplanes discharge greenhouse gasses in abundance, which is not only expediting global warming but also degrading air quality. Besides, flights are troublesome for people who may or may not use the services of airlines. People living in the vicinity of an airport are bound to suffer by extensive noise pollution, especially causing problems to children and aged adults.
Subjective taxation can help in killing two birds with one stone. Excessive tax on every type of flight can cripple the aviation and other associated industries, so only those flight journeys which are avoidable must be taxed highly. Besides, shifting to biofuels would grant a new lease of life to airlines.
Although aviation is serving many recreational and social purposes, the authority has to design some policies to counter the negatives of air flying to use the aeroplanes more effectively.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 3.0 24.0651302605 12% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1499.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61423220974 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98352163361 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647940074906 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.6015372746 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6875 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6875 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100190368109 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0239252568096 0.084324248473 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409420104791 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0502949505758 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352510884183 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.96 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.4 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.