The world s most urgent problem is caused by over population Do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

The world’s most urgent problem is caused by over-population. Do you agree or disagree?

It is argued that many countries in the world are facing with one of the most serious problem, which is massive increase in world’s population. Personally, I completely agree with this view because of its negative effect on human development and environment.

There are a variety of reasons why the dramatic growth of population in the world brings a harmful effect on the quality of human’s life and global budget as well. Firstly, over-population phenomenon has resulted in the lack of accommodation for a large number of people, especially with those living in crowded cities and metropolitan areas. This reason because the small number of available housing are not able to meet the demand for the need of living facility. As a result, if people do not have any shelter, they mostly will build an illegal house on the prohibited sectors such as riverbank or top of the hill which are dangerous for them. Furthermore, the unemployment rate would be likely to higher because of joblessness that profoundly affected on not only world’s economy which makes it go down but also social issues , in particularly is the rising of violent criminal in the community. Consequently, with the world’s economy is stagnant and undeveloped, the whole society has witnessed the majority of citizens who turn into offenders with the hopes of earning enough money for making end meets.

Apart from the practical concerns expressed above, I believe that over-population would lead to several issues which are associated with living environment. Firstly, some consequences including air pollution, contamination of water or land which stem from the massive number of transportation users or the arising of industrial areas. For example, over-using a mean of transport mode burning fossil fuel, applying chemical fertilisers into the field of agricultural and discharging toxic waste into water resources all lead to greenhouse gas emission that causes environmental damage severely. Secondly, some endangered species of animal would be on the brink of extinction if there is no longer living inhabitant. This would mean that people are cutting down tree or even killing animals for living purposes as building houses, schools, hospitals, modern facilities and being main food resources for the massive number of civilians in the world.

In conclusion, I believe that the phenomenon of over-population should be top-priority concern to many national governments in the world.

Votes
Average: 8 (44 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 252, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...sulted in the lack of accommodation for a large number of people, especially with those living in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 724, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ate would be likely to higher because of joblessness that profoundly affected on ...
^^
Line 3, column 841, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... makes it go down but also social issues , in particularly is the rising of violen...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, well, apart from, for example, in conclusion, in particular, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2098.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 389.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39331619537 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08177395399 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591259640103 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 662.4 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.7534239715 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.857142857 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7857142857 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17394272722 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0572816793497 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628109324484 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117623860857 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0637027917593 0.056905535591 112% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.