Write about the following topic:
Most major cities around the world continue to grow at a phenomenal rate due to the massive increase in population. This has led to a general decline in the quality of life in city areas as the environment becomes more crowded and polluted.
Give some reasons why this growth has occurred and suggest some practical solutions to this problem.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.
Write at least 250 words.
These years, the gallop in the human population has instigated rapid outbreaks of megacities, which results in the degradation of nature and later, triggers off a nosedive in the quality of life. Many factors have purportedly prompted this propensity and caused unexpected repercussions.
Firstly, the rocketing demand for shelter, food, and beverages is to blame for the abrupt shift. It accelerates deforestation with rapid velocity as the need for more space for new residents soars under the pressure of urban sprawl. So far, a study has shown that the speed of afforestation can not catch up with that of its counterpart, rendering the deficiency of tree supplies. The lack of natural fauna decimates wildlife brutally since they can be poached or even killed on the street for their fur, ivory, et cetera. Moreover, the diminution of plants also excretes more CO2 into the air, aggravating climate change and wreaking havoc on the quality of our life.
Secondly, more people flocking to major cities also intensify the exploitation of natural resources. Gas, copper, zinc, and the like are already on the verge of scarcity: if urbanization resists, these non-renewable sources will likely go extinct. Not only does the increase in dwellers take a toll on the environment but it also indicates that people will dispose of more refuse. It has been recently found that the more cramped a place seems to be, the less responsible individuals feel towards it. Few citizens find themselves under no obligation to clean off the garbage thrown out by others even though it can have a negative impact on their health as well as global warming. This attitude eggs on worsening the Earth’s existing conditions to some certain extent.
To mitigate the issue, the government has to implement some hard-line, setting strict stipulations in motion to prohibit littering so as to reduce the heaps of rubbish piled on the curb. Furthermore, should the government propagandize the need for even distribution of population and raise the awareness of the public, things are to be ameliorated.
In conclusion, these problems are no pushovers and will require discreet resolutions to overturn their roots completely. Yet I believe as long as people join hands, there will be no feat that we can not achieve.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 162, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ation of nature and later, triggers off a nosedive in the quality of life. Many factors ha...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and caused unexpected repercussions. Firstly, the rocketing demand for shelte...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...king havoc on the quality of our life. Secondly, more people flocking to major ...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng conditions to some certain extent. To mitigate the issue, the government ha...
^^^
Line 7, column 132, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...lations in motion to prohibit littering so as to reduce the heaps of rubbish piled on th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...public, things are to be ameliorated. In conclusion, these problems are no pus...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, as to, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1931.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 374.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16310160428 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88068691744 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628342245989 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 608.4 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.9847401018 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.588235294 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.70588235294 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0894744024197 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0272152651251 0.084324248473 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0349617161165 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0420495487222 0.151304729494 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331437320407 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.