Traffic congestion and jams is one of the most serious problem in big cities almost all over the world and it has made people's lives more difficult. This essay will elaborate root causes of traffic jams and possible solution of this problem.
The two main causes of overcrowding and traffic jams are increasing of private vehicles like cars and bikes as well as lack of public transportation available for the citizens. Today, cars factories have started to produce more and it is easy for people to have one. Furthermore, many families even own one car for one person which results in the increase of traffic congestion. Due to deficiency in public transportation it is obvious that because of this the people will use their private vehicle that is inconvenient and inefficient. For instance, even people use their own cars even in rush hours.
Some possible solutions to this problems are, firstly, government should allow efficient, frequent and comfortable transport to all citizens. To exemplify, government should provide more number of public transportation as well as available for several times a day which suits to the citizens. Secondly, every people of the countries should motivate each and every person to use the concept of car pooling. For example, car pooling with their neighbors and also with their colleagues on the same time. Therefore, it will reduce the traffic jams in such part of the cities.
In conclusion, traffic is mainly caused by overpopulation in the cities and people which are dependent on their own cars, also, due to not getting sufficient amount of public vehicles. If government provides more facilities to public transport, it will definitely reduce the level of traffic in cities in the near future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 28, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...sh hours. Some possible solutions to this problems are, firstly, government shoul...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11888111888 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79879325414 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513986013986 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8837113543 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.571428571 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4285714286 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185672303567 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0733120830323 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578192394059 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133061252432 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0678619002729 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.