Nowadays, material possessions and social status might be the new symbols of personal worth, and it is no longer vital of old-fashioned values as respect, gentleness, and trust. It might be true especially in a great city, but it might be not true in each personal views.
It is apparent that in developing city like Bangkok as you can see at presently, many people perform their social status and material possessions throw social media. This posting photos on Instagram or Facebook with brand name clothes or bags and driving expensive cars, or they are having a luxury dinner. Therefore, many people judge these people that they might be a person who worth by material possessions and social status without knowing them by personal.
It seems to me that in each personal views, some people still believe in values. For example, every parent always teaches their own child to be a positive person and to be kind and helpful to people around them. Likewise, the parent wants their kids to be personal trust because they need their children to be growing by loving family or people surrounding them. Plus, they can be trusted with their friendship or business partnership and to be a good personal of the citizen.
To conclude, I completely disagree with this statement because I believe that status and possessions cannot be replaced old-fashioned values as a personal's worth and each personal has their own worth without materials. However, it is apparent that in some city, some people still mention a personal.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, likewise, so, still, therefore, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1276.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02362204724 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6289073438 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527559055118 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 382.5 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0129993502 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0909090909 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.18181818182 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260820987615 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108489772011 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.069395484921 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167718903474 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0222277636547 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 78.4519038076 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.