You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Some museums and art galleries charge admission fees while others have free entry Do you think the advantages of charging for admission outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any

Essay topics:

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Some museums and art galleries charge admission fees, while others have free entry.

Do you think the advantages of charging for admission outweigh the disadvantages?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

You should write at least 254 words.

Museums and art galleries serve as a place of gathering knowledge and education about their history, culture, and heritage. Many museums and art galleries in the world set entrance fees for the general public as well as the tourists whereas others do not charge any. The huge advantage of having an entry charge like revenue generation for both museum and country will far outweigh any disadvantages that it might bring.

Entrance fees to get into the museums and art galleries are advantageous for many reasons. First of all, these fees can create a source of income for these facilities which they can spend on the maintenance of facilities and covering the overhead cost. In addition, they can design, decorate, expand, and present their facility with more resources, information, and advanced technologies when they have extra money on hand. For example, the Royal Tyrrel Museum of Drumheller is investing their earnings from the museum more on research and development of fossils and the extinction process of dinosaurs to make the learning more effective for the public. Thus, it is gaining more attraction from the tourism industry. Therefore, it can be said without any doubt that admission charges to these facilities generating revenue for both the museum and the province and making education more useful.

Art galleries and museums are a massive repository of knowledge and thus having entry fees can inhibit people to visit there. As a result, they will not be well known and informed about their heritage and culture and can not represent their country properly. Moreover, many students and researchers go to these places to complete their study assignments or research, and thus they can benefit hugely. Hence, having an admission charge can deter the opportunity of learning leaving them for using only the government funding facilities.

In conclusion, charging fees for entrance to art galleries and museums keep these facilities resourceful, well-maintained, and up to date which for sure the government-run institution is lacking. It might seem a little expensive at first but eventually, the experience and learning will be far more extensive and vast, and surely outweigh any flaws.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 195, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... in the world set entrance fees for the general public as well as the tourists whereas others ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 475, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to leave'.
Suggestion: to leave
...e can deter the opportunity of learning leaving them for using only the government fund...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 351, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd vast, and surely outweigh any flaws.
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 10.4138276553 259% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1869.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29461756374 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79822451369 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526912181303 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 578.7 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9858093841 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.6 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5333333333 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53333333333 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278856523993 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106420310938 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0792376712524 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193603752875 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0720566505604 0.056905535591 127% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.