You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Some museums and art galleries charge admission fees, while others have free entry.
Do you think the advantages of charging for admission outweigh the disadvantages?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
You should write at least 254 words.
Many museums and art galleries in the world set entrance fees for the general public as well as the tourists whereas others do not charge any. The huge advantage of having an entry charge like revenue generation for both museum and country will far outweigh any disadvantages that it might bring.
First of all, these fees can create a source of income for these facilities which they can spend on the maintenance of facilities and covering the overhead cost. In addition, they can design, decorate, expand, and present their facility with more resources, information, and advanced technologies when they have extra money on hand. For example, the Royal Tyrrel Museum of Drumheller is investing their earnings from the museum more on research and development of fossils and the extinction process of dinosaurs to make the learning more effective for the public. Therefore, it can be said without any doubt that admission charges to these facilities generating revenue for both the museum and the province and making education more useful.
Art galleries and museums are a massive repository of knowledge and thus having entry fees can inhibit people to visit there. As a result, they will not be well known and informed about their heritage and culture and can not represent their country properly. Moreover, many students and researchers go to these places to complete their study assignments or research, and thus they can benefit hugely. Hence, having an admission charge can deter the opportunity of learning leaving them for using only the government funding facilities.
In conclusion, charging fees for entrance to art galleries and museums keep these facilities resourceful, well-maintained, and up to date which for sure the government-run institution is lacking. It might seem a little expensive at first but eventually, the experience and learning will be far more extensive and vast, and surely outweigh any flaws.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 71, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... in the world set entrance fees for the general public as well as the tourists whereas others ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 475, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to leave'.
Suggestion: to leave
...e can deter the opportunity of learning leaving them for using only the government fund...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 351, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd vast, and surely outweigh any flaws.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 10.4138276553 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1635.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29126213592 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79860251465 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553398058252 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 28.7875358831 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 136.25 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9166666667 7.06120827912 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26337539072 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108623860454 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0785916497785 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185503979343 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0774003573067 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.